| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
614
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 11:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
seany1212 wrote:LOLd hard, because when you die every module drops...  This just shows your grasp on the game tbh, bounties are immediate payouts, blue loot is market related. NERF CONCORD LP AS WELL AS INCURSION PAYOUTS  Actually to be fair ship losses are not technically ISK sinks, although item and ship destruction is a pretty fundamental requirement for Eve's economy it is not due to them removing ISK from the game. If anything, thanks to insurance, ship losses are actually an ISK faucet. (Unless you're in T2/T3 ships, naturlich.)
Also, the blue loot Darth is going on about is actually an ISK faucet, it's the data things you sell to NPC market orders.
DarthNefarius wrote:You made some very good points I concede but there are a few counter points: -OK in a C4+ you would be making more Wealth my understanding is the c1-c3 are lo ends & the C5+ are hi end? Actually no, in a C5+ you can make a reasonable amount from the capital escalations etc. but most of your ISK will come from the high end ladars. Again, this is profit that you will not be getting from blue loot, but from selling goods. The combat sites will quickly be exhausted by any alliance/corp, and remember that you have to share profit for the limited number of sites you have access to.
For a solo player C3s and below are the only realistic option, C4s are probably the limit for the slightly more determined solo players with multiple accounts. However, even dual boxing WHs, you will still make less ISK per hour than you would dual boxing incursions. And you're risking your ships, and half your ISK comes in the form of ribbons which again, isn't just magical ISK stuck into your wallet.
DarthNefarius wrote:-160 million is near perfect legion blitz fleet w/o bio breaks except during warps ( possible for a lil more but not much ) A lot of people dual box incursions, and 160m isn't that unrealistic for us. And before you say "I'd never have a dual boxer in my fleet", we don't tell you we're dual boxing. "Can I bring my friends who're also in shiny ships" usually translates into "I'm dual/triple boxing, but I'll be damned if I'll admit it to you".
DarthNefarius wrote:I am curious: you said your WH losses were due to other players & your mistakes so a portion of that I take it were to NPC's and other portion was due to the nature of no Concord. Remeber in lo & NULL concord is not present so there is more ISK ( maybe alot less risk though in NULL if you are deep in SOV ) I would hazard a guess his mistakes led to death from other players, NPC deaths are pretty rare.
DarthNefarius wrote:My real point in this thread is that there is aproblem with the ISK faucets all around and J space is not getting all the nerfs that the rest of Eve will be shouldering. FACE IT CCP THE REAL LOSERS HERE IS THE DRONE LEGIONS WITH THE CRAPPY TRUE SEC UNBALANCING !!! More I hear about it the worse the bounties are for peeps living there and the only way to make it better is to further unbalance inflation for the rest of Eve. Sounds like Drone region needs a few Tech Moons to spawn The problem is you seem to believe CCP's intent with the upcoming changes was to decrease inflation, I see no evidence of this. They were merely performing risk/reward rebalancing, and attempting to fix the mining profession. I'm also pretty sure they are well aware of the risks of mudflation, which is probably why they are now going on an RMT sweep, following in the foot steps of Final Fantasy XI's creators.
Anyway, so far they seem to have done a good job, but in order to see that first you need to realize that their intent was never to provide us all with cheap ships and modules.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
614
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 11:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Comy 1 wrote:I could actually agree on nerfing the income from sleepers with 10% if we got instant bounty payout rather than blue items that you need to haul to empire and sell.
Alternatively, remove all bounties from the game and replace with their own version of blue loot that every carebear has to move into high/low/npc null and sell.
We shall see how happy every incursion or mission runner will be when his ship full of bounty loot gets suicide ganked and he realize everything he worked for during a week is lost in a glorious fire. Actually that would be pretty awesome.
Hehe, imagine making incursion fleets salvage, loot and distribute everything between fleet members fairly CCP totally should have gone that route for slowing down VG blitzing. Hell, they should have made them scan down the sites too 
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
614
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 11:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hathrul wrote:actually you are wrong here. the main income in higher class wormhole space is blue loot. where in low class wormholes most income hopefully comes from the salvaged nanoribbons, and you basically get lucky or unlucky on paychecks, the amount of elite sleeper battleships that you get from quad escalating every anomaly and radar/mag will yield so much blue loot that it outshines nanoribbons by far (though those are always tasty) Hmm, are you certain of that? When applying for talcon united a little while back I was told they made the majority of their ISK from ladars, and that I should train up gas harvesting straight away. May have just been a case of the guy recruiting me having a ladar fetish though 
I must admit anyway, I never bothered training up gas harvesting, or joining talocan. So my experience in WHs is still limited to triple boxing c3/c4 combat sites 
Hathrul wrote:as for the ladars. yes, they can actually make you some nice money, and probebly come near regular sleeper ops in terms of income. the reason why in reality they mostly dont is 1. they are harder to find then anomalies. 2. they take a lot longer to do. 3. the sleeper spawn mechanics are annoying. warp to it, go afk half an hour, clean sleepers and then you can do it. 4. the vital and core ladars, where the good stuff is are fairly rare. even if you chain collapse your static it can take several tries to find a single one. and while you can easily have 2 fleets of farming t3's in a c5 running the sites at the same time, the limited amount of ladars make this anything but viable for the bigger alliances Hmm, harder to find than anomalies? If people in a WH are ignoring sites because they CBA to scan out a system... well... wth are they doing in a WH? 
But yeah, I imagine raiding other WHs specifically for ladars is pretty lame, which is why I've always ignored them myself. Although they sound quite profitable in terms of running them in your own system when they crop up, or in a neighboring system if your alliance has just put a lot of guys in there to run anoms anyway.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
614
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 14:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:At this point I have to object to the subject line in this post for insulting our dear friends to the north, the Scottish people. The inference here is that Scots go free. Sure, some Scots go free, but there's no evidence saying any more Scots go free than any other group of people, such as the Irish, or the Italians for that matter! Next thing you know someone will equate the Scots with penny-pinching. It's shameful, I tell yah.
Brought to you as a public service by People Against Making Scots Look Cheap. All rights reserved. Hehe, actually the term scot-free has nothing to do with the Scottish, it's just coincidence that they happen to get called scots :P
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
617
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 15:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Abraxas666 wrote:with ships getting blown up everywhere there is isk constantly disappearing from the game (...) This is because incursion money stays in the economy, incursion ships rarely get blown up and even when those faction ships pop the mineral loss isn't much different than any tech-1 battleship. I agree with every point you made bar these two, ship destruction doesn't result in an ISK loss, it merely encourages ISK to change hands. Namely, it causes the ISK to be redistributed to miners and industrialists who constructed the ships that replace the ones that were destroyed.
Similarly, the mineral difference between pirate faction BS and T1 BS is irrelevant, that extra money goes to explorers, or mission runners who bought the BPC with LP.
Ship destruction is a necessary and vital aspect of Eve's economy, as it raises the velocity at which money changes hands, but it is not technically an ISK sink. Although an increased rate of trading does result in more money being taken out of the economy via production costs and transaction taxes.
Anyway, to everything else you said, very well put And I especially agree with the point concerning sov null sec, from what I've heard CCP have plans to replace local intel with a true intel tool and that change cannot come about soon enough.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
619
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 18:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:CCP Soundwave ommitted that NPC buy orders would get a 10% nerf too but maybe that is because he already considers them a de facto bounty? I daresay if he is outright reducing all income sources by 10%, he will be including NPC buy orders too.
Whether or not incursions get hit by a second nerf, to compensate for the changes to other professions, is a much more interesting question.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
619
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 20:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:What I'm curious is if drone regions will get an effective third nerf where they'll get yet another 10% nerf on thier Drone bounties To be honest I'm not too bothered about drone regions becoming low value. If it does end up being worthless space it might become a nice area for corps to start out in 0.0, since it would be virtually worthless for the bigger alliances to bust in and take all the space.
That being said, someone would probably still take it over just to rent out.
DarthNefarius wrote:And peeps in W-Space effectively are ignored by the ESCALATION/INFERNO nerf bat which is wack-a-moleing EVERYONE ELSE  They haven't said anything about whether or not they are nerfing the w-space bounty payouts, so it's pointless rage poasting about it. But in all honesty even if they don't bother wormhole space is probably the only space in Eve at the moment that deserves to keep it's current payouts.
And that's coming from a null sec resident, I'm not just defending them because I live in one.
Also, even though I admit null sec probably doesn't warrant exemption from nerfs at the moment, I would like to see null sec eventually buffed. But I'd also like to see logistics made more difficult and a local intel nerf in order to justify those buffs.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
619
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 22:00:00 -
[8] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote: They haven't said anything about whether or not they are nerfing the w-space bounty payouts,
Exactly they have not said anything. Every other space has had an announcement of changes & it seems they're being adversly affected and being ignored by CCP is what all should strive for if they like playing the game in thier respective niches. Sounds like to me since the peeps living in W-space are not complaining about anything maybe that means they should get a shake up in the ant farm So you want WH space to be nerfed, because no one is complaining about it being imbalanced? :/ I don't really see the logic in that.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
627
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 23:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Bane Nucleus wrote: Also, wh space hasn't been shaken up because it's pretty damn close to perfect as it is. As the old saying goes "If it isn't broken, don't fix it."
CCP has been violating the don't break what works rule for soooo long I'm surprised you brought that line up. Sorry but ALL ISK faucets combined are a big problem CCP Soundwave has admitted it to & saying WH's ISK faucet which is concentrated in the hands of much fewer then Incursions ( while being nearly the same exact amount ) shouldn't be touched along with the rest of the Sandbox makes me laugh I iterate CCP where's the Wormhole NERFS to Escaltation WHY ARE THEY GETTING OFF SCOT FREE?? BURN EVERYONE EQUALLY WHERE IT COMES TO THE ISK FAUCET 10% NERFS Risk reward balance.
Now HTFU and stop bumping this terrible excuse for a thread.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
630
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 20:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bane Nucleus wrote:Kirell wrote:I will confirm something for all of you that aren't aware of how much money you can make in wormholes.
I've been living ina C4 wormhole up until recently (I removed everything as I am leaving the game and sellign this char off ad I've recently sold several other chars) I was going to biomass but friends implored me not to mostly because they didn't want everything to go to waste. So to help them enjoy EVE more I'm giving everything away to them.
Anyways.
Wormholes are as someone in this thread stated, a fountain of isk.
In a C4 static C3 (C247) wormhole I could re-roll wormholes in a matter of minutes. I could then scan out a C3 quickly with a max skilled scanning char, and close/bubble any Wh's in that C3. I could run the sites with little to no risk. making approx 300 mil an hour with 3 characters.
The only risk - new Wh's opening up into the system I am running. EASY TO NEGATE just scan every sig, eliminate them (or write down the codes) keep a probe up in system that covers the entire system. watch for ne WH's while doing sleepers = EASY.
C4's I was making around 400 mil an hour using 3 chars - 1 in a carrier and 2 maelstroms. EASY.
C5's make EVEN MORE isk. But need at least 2 people flying 2 chars each totalling 4 tengu's. If you can escalate the sites then even better. You can make approx 500-700 mil an hour iN C5's.
And even with all these precautions, you will still get ganked at some point. Just the nature of the beast. We caught 3 tengus who did this same exact thing. Incoming wh's were bubbled and had mass put through them. It didn't save them. The point being is that incursions dont have any of these risks. You shouldn't be making as much as wormhole space. Lastly, Earl Gray tea is the best Tea. Earl Gray. Hot.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
630
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 22:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:seany1212 wrote:
Exactly the point of your thread: "WAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH INCURSIONS ARE GETTING NUFFED, NUFF EVERYTHING ELSE NAO!!!"
Nope actually my point is every single ISK fountain EXCEPT wormholes has had the announcement of a nerf . Since WH's are a part of the sandbox they should too participate in the 10% cut to counter inflation along with Incursions and bounties. They spout just as much ISK into Eve & are far less numbers then bounties ( and 1/2 the number of Incursion runners ) Can you link these stats on the number of people running whs? Or are you just making them up?
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
631
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 23:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:seany1212 wrote:
Exactly the point of your thread: "WAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH INCURSIONS ARE GETTING NUFFED, NUFF EVERYTHING ELSE NAO!!!"
Nope actually my point is every single ISK fountain EXCEPT wormholes has had the announcement of a nerf . Since WH's are a part of the sandbox they should too participate in the 10% cut to counter inflation along with Incursions and bounties. They spout just as much ISK into Eve & are far less numbers then bounties ( and 1/2 the number of Incursion runners ) Can you link these stats on the number of people running whs? Or are you just making them up? http://d35dgn2pdc8wsn.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/04.jpghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MZD6-vGQms That is the number of people who LIVE in wormholes.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
632
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 01:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Lol so his data shows the percentage of characters situated in whs, rather the number of players who run wh sites. And it also fails to display the percentage of characters that run incursions, rendering the entire dataset useless for making such a comparison.
Bravo Darth, bravo.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
635
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 09:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them.
People scan down sites in high sec, jump in and run c1/c2 wormholes in their drakes or overpriced tengus. Similarly, people scan down C3s in low sec and do the same, a lot of major null sec alliances scan down c5/c6 whs and have entire capital ops where they jump in and clear capital escalation sites. In fact recently I think -A- took over a few WH systems for this very purpose.
None of these people live in wormholes, they live in high sec, low sec and null sec, yet they likely contribute just as much to the total amount of blue loot farmed as any WH dweller. And this is why your stats are completely useless, because the number of people living in wormholes, which is hard to calculate accurately anyway, is not even remotely related to the number of people raiding wormholes for PvE content.
DarthNefarius wrote:If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. If you're talking about the graph showing the number of incursions runners that is fairly useless for your purposes for the reason stated above. But, assuming it was useful, that looks like ~17,000 people running incursions, right?
How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes?
400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600
So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that?
Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
641
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 22:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Bane Nucleus wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Tea. Earl Gray. Hot. Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver Fairly certain I just performed the Picard Maneuver on Darth's terrible statistics.
No known defense mother ******.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
641
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:[quote=Bane Nucleus][quote=Simi Kusoni]Tea. Earl Gray. Hot.[/quote Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver[/quote Fairly certain I just performed the Picard Maneuver on Darth's terrible statistics No known defense mother ******. lol I took 1 day off o Forums & Simi tries her hand in math & statistics [:roll: Bravo your 1 attempt at math was waaaaaaaaaay off. I'll let you stare at the numbers & come up with why ( hint stare at QEN's 2010 :) I did a little stat mining from some tweet & found some interesting numbers on wormhole jumps you should check it out... https://twitter.com/#!/CCP_Diagora but more to my point about the ISK faucet of WH's here's a few CCP stats from CCP_Diagoras "Sell-to-NPCs items from wormholes generated 346bn ISK yesterday. 10.43tn ISK in Feb 2012 total. 5:01 AM - 8 Mar 12 via web" -+ Embed this Tweet "Sunday 19th Feb; 886bn spent on minerals, 619bn on battleships, 374bn sleeper components, 359bn composite materials, 339bn ice products. and a comparison versus Incursions faucet "Average payout for Incursion participants on the 1st of Feb was 169.5m ISK. 301.8bn payout total, 1,781 participants" To be fair though I'll give you Feb 1st was a wednesday & both Feb 19th & March 11th were days on the weekend I'm trying to extract actual sites being run from the NPC kills stats reported from CCP_Diagoras in his tweets but thats difficult... the numbers of Incursion runners is a easier stat from the way Incursion payout mechanism is set up If CCP_Diagoras threw out a stat of the numbers of ribbons were salvaged on a given day & were used or sold over a month that stat would be golden What is this I don't even.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
641
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Just Alter wrote:Wormholes are fine as they are.
If anything they should be more lucrative, especially c5 and c6.
The risk involved is immense and at the end of the day, incursions are still better. Personally I've always found it odd c1/c2 wormholes hold so little value, they are essentially just as dangerous as c3s, perhaps more so due to players that scan them down out of high sec and watch the API stats to see when someone is killing NPCs in there.
Either way though, whs in general are perfectly balanced, and probably one of the best parts of the game at the moment. They're certainly the most dangerous.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
642
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:16:00 -
[18] - Quote
Just Alter wrote:Yeah they're the most dangerous.
However when thinking about these kind of things you have to think like this: "how can something be exploited?".
If c1 and c2 were more lucrative people could simply chain farm them with a t3 and then collapse the hole and farm them again. That's true, plus whilst the challenge in wormholes doesn't really come from the sleepers it does make sense to have at least some link between NPC difficulty and ISK payout.
Even if the only real repercussion of tougher NPCs is that people are forced to risk shinier ships. And boy do I love it when people use shiny ships in WHs The more people flying around j-space in deadspace pinatas the better <3
Just Alter wrote:I'm advocating increasing c5-c6 simply because they're extremely hard and they should pay something absurd Hmm, I'll be honest I mostly do solo stuff (Well, solo as in solo with four characters), so I haven't had much experience in terms of c5/c6 payouts. I was under the impression they were already quite good though?
Just Alter wrote:(oh and btw between whs and incursions i'll always prefer incursions) Really? I got bored of them pretty quickly I find that at least doing exploration or wormholes I have a little variety between sites, and scanning breaks up the monotony of site grinding a little bit.
Still, incursions are more fun than level fours, by christ. I had to run a few level fours to grind my trading alts standings up the other day. Closest I've ever come to biomassing my toons.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
654
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 23:57:00 -
[19] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:DarthNefarius wrote: my point about what should be nerfed so here: BOUNTIES. INCURSION PAYOUTS, & SLEEPER COMPONENTS Because WH's and their rewards are balanced, unlike hi-sec incursions. Reading your posts is like watching a two year old throw a tantrum. Hey, most two year olds are considerably more literate. No need to go dragging their names through the mud just thanks to darth's bad poasting.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
655
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 00:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
13 pages of people disagreeing with him and he's still going, got to be some kind of record.
Anyone want to take bets on how many pages this reaches before it gets locked?
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
656
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 01:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Just Alter wrote:[ But, as many tried to tell you before, those blue loot isk have a different value than the same amount of money made in an high sex incursion.
??? ISK is ISK I wonder what amounts of ISK is brought in the lo&NULL sex Incursions too I haven't seen that stat yet either People should really stop feeding the troll.
If you can't explain something to someone within 13 pages, then you cannot explain something to somebody.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
656
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 01:29:00 -
[22] - Quote
Just Alter wrote:Absolutely confirmed as a troll.
He didnt even dare to quote the second part of my post.
I think he is genuine, but he is an incursion runner and he sees the game from only that perspective. He also lacks the subtlety or eloquence to attempt to defend incursions, or attack other aspects of the game, effectively. Resulting in repetitive troll-like bad poasting.
Although I will admit, he is admirably persistant.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
656
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 01:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Look on the bright side though, we now have a 13 page thread that will serve as a monument to popular opinion on the idea of nerfing whs. Thereby ensuring whs won't be nerfed for a very, very long time.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
656
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 01:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Just Alter wrote: You want to reduce inflation? nerf incursions and high sec lvl 4 more, leave everything else the same.
Incursions will be NERFed on the 24th we'll see how much Inflation is decreased the next month  Inflation doesn't work like that you imbecile.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
657
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 01:49:00 -
[25] - Quote
<----- Currently accepting ISK donations to help buy Darth Nefarious a market crash course from the MD sub forum.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
792
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 09:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Must be nice to be let alone from CCP in Wormhole space ... I guess I should make it my mission to go where ever CCP is ignoring to carve out my own happy niche in Eve. By all means, please, move in to wormhole space. Especially since we know this your main.
I would be happy to take a few t3s off your hands, I hear they drop good loot and salvage pretty well too.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
792
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 10:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Roime wrote:He doesn't even read what other people post, just rants on inane.
Should be banned. Yeah, but this thread is making an epic case for buffing wormholes so I say let it be.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
876
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 11:26:00 -
[28] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:You didn't prove jack shite
DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them.
People scan down sites in high sec, jump in and run c1/c2 wormholes in their drakes or overpriced tengus. Similarly, people scan down C3s in low sec and do the same, a lot of major null sec alliances scan down c5/c6 whs and have entire capital ops where they jump in and clear capital escalation sites. In fact recently I think -A- took over a few WH systems for this very purpose.
None of these people live in wormholes, they live in high sec, low sec and null sec, yet they likely contribute just as much to the total amount of blue loot farmed as any WH dweller. And this is why your stats are completely useless, because the number of people living in wormholes, which is hard to calculate accurately anyway, is not even remotely related to the number of people raiding wormholes for PvE content.
DarthNefarius wrote:If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. If you're talking about the graph showing the number of incursions runners that is fairly useless for your purposes for the reason stated above. But, assuming it was useful, that looks like ~17,000 people running incursions, right?
How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes?
400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600
So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that?
Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
890
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 11:29:00 -
[29] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:You talking to me about statisics?!?!? lol You've never ever shown one xcept crude outta your arse
DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them.
People scan down sites in high sec, jump in and run c1/c2 wormholes in their drakes or overpriced tengus. Similarly, people scan down C3s in low sec and do the same, a lot of major null sec alliances scan down c5/c6 whs and have entire capital ops where they jump in and clear capital escalation sites. In fact recently I think -A- took over a few WH systems for this very purpose.
None of these people live in wormholes, they live in high sec, low sec and null sec, yet they likely contribute just as much to the total amount of blue loot farmed as any WH dweller. And this is why your stats are completely useless, because the number of people living in wormholes, which is hard to calculate accurately anyway, is not even remotely related to the number of people raiding wormholes for PvE content.
DarthNefarius wrote:If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. If you're talking about the graph showing the number of incursions runners that is fairly useless for your purposes for the reason stated above. But, assuming it was useful, that looks like ~17,000 people running incursions, right?
How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes?
400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600
So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that?
Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
968
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:57:00 -
[30] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Apolyon I wrote:quote] inflation started getting worse as incursion came out, isnt it notable??? Incorrect Inflation started getting worse BEFORE Incursions came out Good thing the incursion nerf was to address the ****** up state of risk/reward, and not as a hotfix to inflation then.
Also, anyone interested in a quick break down of why darth's statistics suck, scroll to top of page. I will be reposting that information periodically as he repeatedly tries to bury it with necro ship toasting.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
968
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 18:08:00 -
[31] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:I'd start reposting of your statistics but there are not any
DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them.
People scan down sites in high sec, jump in and run c1/c2 wormholes in their drakes or overpriced tengus. Similarly, people scan down C3s in low sec and do the same, a lot of major null sec alliances scan down c5/c6 whs and have entire capital ops where they jump in and clear capital escalation sites. In fact recently I think -A- took over a few WH systems for this very purpose.
None of these people live in wormholes, they live in high sec, low sec and null sec, yet they likely contribute just as much to the total amount of blue loot farmed as any WH dweller. And this is why your stats are completely useless, because the number of people living in wormholes, which is hard to calculate accurately anyway, is not even remotely related to the number of people raiding wormholes for PvE content.
DarthNefarius wrote:If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. If you're talking about the graph showing the number of incursions runners that is fairly useless for your purposes for the reason stated above. But, assuming it was useful, that looks like ~17,000 people running incursions, right?
How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes?
400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600
So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that?
Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
968
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 18:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:Mars Theran wrote:[quote=DarthNefarius][quote=Derth Ramir]
You also have to consider time investment here. Wormholers probably have one of the highest time requirements placed on them with regard to managing their POSs, mining Gasses, Scanning, and running Sleeper sites which aren't exactly as common as missions or even remotely frequent spawners. Then there is just general time spent scouting and watching and spying/surveiling, which accounts for almost half of any wormholers time in game provided they actually make an effort and don't just show up to blow up Sleepers.
In all, it has a high burnout factor for anyone that actually invests in it actively in game, and you want to take away the one relatively guaranteed payout for all that time invested. Good job. Wormholes pale in comparison to null sec sov holding in terms of costs incurred. And we're forced to sell our harvested resources on the market just like everyone else. No NPC buy orders outside the overseers artifacts which are rare. Overseers artifacts? You mean the personal effects from rated sites? I used to get about 7 or more of them a day when I was in sov null :) I did have one hell of a system for farming rated sites though :P and they do need to be transported for sale, unlike incursion payouts.
But mainly just the sheer effort required to find and run the sites far exceeds the effort required to farm incursions.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
968
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 22:16:00 -
[33] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:[How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes?
400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600
So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that?
Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again.
Go read Q4 QEN 2010 in order to figure out how the numbers of residents in Wormholes is calculated. Dr E's chart in fanfest 2012 said 5% of Eve's characters were running Incursions too. The data I used was from sources linked and used by yourself, I did these quick calculations purely to show the errors in your own calculations that used the same data.
I have no idea if the results are actually accurate, CCP statistics tend to have enormous unspecified margins of error, they fluctuate wildly between various posts and the methodology by which CCP arrives at them is often never explained.
And you still don't understand that the number of people running wormhole sites is greater than the number living in them. Genius.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
968
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 23:51:00 -
[34] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:
The data I used was from sources linked and used by yourself, I did these quick calculations purely to show the errors in your own calculations that used the same data.
No it wasn't you lie. Your statistics are way off & further show how of the mark your assumptions are. All of the statistics used to disprove your analysis came from the sources that you yourself used:
*Just to clarify these above are the sources you posted, exactly how you posted them in this post.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
970
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 23:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
And just to unbury it (again) here is the specific part of my post disproving your analysis using that data:
DarthNefarius wrote:If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. If you're talking about the graph showing the number of incursions runners that is fairly useless for your purposes for the reason stated above. But, assuming it was useful, that looks like ~17,000 people running incursions, right?
How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes?
400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600
So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that?
Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
970
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 17:03:00 -
[36] - Quote
Darth stop evading it every time you get your arse handed to you in a debate, and either post a logical and reasoned argument or just accept defeat.
Face it, you've lost this thread. You may as well let it die rather than continuously post empty comments. To be honest I am surprised CCP haven't locked it yet.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
982
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 12:27:00 -
[37] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Darth stop evading it every time you get your arse handed to you in a debate, and either post a logical and reasoned argument or just accept defeat.
Face it, you've lost this thread. You may as well let it die rather than continuously post empty comments. To be honest I am surprised CCP haven't locked it yet. Simi do a little research & you could argue your point sooo much better with real math!!! So How many characters live in WH Space according to Dr E? & how much was your math off by? ( on a side not why does Dr E's graph in fanfest 2012 say 5% of Eve's population has been doing Incursions? ) So what you are saying is that the CCP statistics you were using are incredibly speculative, highly innacurate and unverifiable?
Well done for finally understanding the point I was making. Have a space cookie.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1001
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 20:12:00 -
[38] - Quote
:insert previous 16 pages of arguments here:
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1012
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 22:40:00 -
[39] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:Apolyon I wrote:maybe because wh offers REAL risk Really???? The only "risk" in a wormhole is you forget to hit that scan button every 5-10 seconds and look for combat probes. I have met quite a few players that believe that. They see the combats out and instantly warp off to a safe, before leaving the way they came in. Problem is I've usually been watching them, and log in on the other side of the wormhole just as they warp to it.
Other times I just find them on directional and warp straight into their site after getting a warp in with my alt, decloaking as I land on them. Depends on the ship though, since the sleepers have an annoying tendency to swap targets I don't usually do that if I'm in recons.
Either way, people who use combats are idiots. The only time you should ever be using combat probes inside or outside of wormholes is if someone is in a safe spot or a mission. Even safe spots you can get without probes if they made the spot in line between two celestials.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1015
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 09:02:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mr Bigwinky wrote:saltrock0000 wrote:Really????
The only "risk" in a wormhole is you forget to hit that scan button every 5-10 seconds and look for combat probes. Hahahaha.. okay confirming that I need combats to catch you. Don't worry about the HICs we have on the wormholes or that dictor we warped to your POS, alligned to where you are and cloaked. You're not safe. Not ever. Even if you do manage to make it to your POS, if you acted this way when I connected to your system, i'd just remove your f*cking POS, not many WH entities take too kindly to pansy-ass farmers who don't fight. Look on the bright side, some of these imbeciles who think you need combats in wormholes are probably going to be trying out wh space soon.
Time to farm me some free c1/c2 tengu kills.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1157
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 09:01:00 -
[41] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Mr Bigwinky wrote:saltrock0000 wrote:Really????
The only "risk" in a wormhole is you forget to hit that scan button every 5-10 seconds and look for combat probes. Hahahaha.. okay confirming that I need combats to catch you. Don't worry about the HICs we have on the wormholes or that dictor we warped to your POS, alligned to where you are and cloaked. You're not safe. Not ever. Even if you do manage to make it to your POS, if you acted this way when I connected to your system, i'd just remove your f*cking POS, not many WH entities take too kindly to pansy-ass farmers who don't fight. Look on the bright side, some of these imbeciles who think you need combats in wormholes are probably going to be trying out wh space soon. Time to farm me some free c1/c2 tengu kills. So how has that improved the bottoming out of T3 prices while all other ships have increased in price since Escalation?  Oh god, you revived this thread again?!
And we've said before, we don't care about T3 prices. People are back running wormholes, T3s are still relatively expensive, life goes on.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1157
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 09:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Wait are you saying that the increase in ship prices is somehow related to the incursion nerf and not the removal of drone alloys and massive overhaul of loot tables Darth believes that WH inhabitants returning to running WHs is a bad thing, and that we should for whatever reason be opposed to it.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1190
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 06:47:00 -
[43] - Quote
BoBoZoBo wrote:HAHA - You're comparing HiSec to W-Space?!?
the problem is that I dont need to spend 700million a month to keep a large POS in HiSec to protect my earnings while exposing myself to an environment deadlier than nullsec and WITHOUT local to help notify me of bad company.
Go spend a month there, then we can consider your proposal. Hmm, I think wh space being more dangerous is questionable. Sure, in null you may lose a few less ships if you are careful, but as a small corp inside a month you'll have had your POS torn down and you'll probably have attracted at least one person like me. Who will leave an alt in your home system 24/7, preventing your members from PvEing indefinitely.
Also, Darth, I admire your fanaticism but I worry for your mental stability.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1190
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 07:01:00 -
[44] - Quote
ABLOOBLOO
I think CCP should nerf incursions again just so we can have more threads like these.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1190
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 10:08:00 -
[45] - Quote
Stalafur wrote:Wormholes are practically twice as hard, you have to deal with rats that switch targets, Drain cap, warp scram and you have to scan down sites to even warp to them. There is no local, no one is daft enough to speak in local. It is a element of surprise but extremely sucks if three bombs uncloak and bomb your men. D-Scan? no feasible on cloakers.  So I can safely say that Wormhole is pretty hard and twice the risk but the rewards are plentiful. Am I the only one that chats in local in WHs?
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1190
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 10:45:00 -
[46] - Quote
aoe dps wrote:nothing makes me happier than to see a 15+ page troll thread :D common guys, this was all bull troll's billy goat gruff from page one! View Darth's post history, he isn't a troll. Just a bit fixated on vanguards and ISK.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1190
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 15:03:00 -
[47] - Quote
Royal Jedi wrote:You sound mad highsec pubby...
You mean you can't harvest rediculous isk anymore, without any risk whatsoever?!?
I feel so bad for you.... Not... stop shitting up the WH forums and go cry elsewhere... This was originally posted in general discussion, I presume a dev quietly moved it in the hope it would kill the thread.
Unfortunately Darth keeps reviving the thread regardless, and has made another terrible thread with a similar theme in GD to replace it.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1197
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:37:00 -
[48] - Quote
QT McWhiskers wrote:Im so glad incursions are **** now. With all of these high SP characters looking for a new home... they might come back to wormholes. And since they are too used to their safety in high sec, it means I will personally be getting tons of extra kills. TONS.
This scrub wants to nerf blue loot yet makes no mention of the thousands, yes thousands, of people killed in high value ships per WEEK in W-space. He obviously has no idea how terrible he is, and how dangerous we are. Thank you to the mod that moved this thread in here. You seriously gave us all something to laugh at eternally. The idea of moving a "nerf wormholes" thread to the wormhole section is quite simply a stroke of genius by whichever dev is responsible.
This thread is certainly going to get a warm reception in a sub-forum full of wormhole pilots.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1201
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 01:48:00 -
[49] - Quote
rofflesausage wrote:No local No hotdrops No easy jump freighter logistics No easy gate camps No station docking games Actual effort required to get back in once you've been podded
Lets leave the holes to the pros, eh?
Oh for the love of god especially that one.
Jump freighters have to have been one of the silliest things ever to be implemented in this game. I also quite like the way WHs tend to encourage fighting in space, rather than on gates or stations.
Either way, the "look at the shiny kills" argument used above is silly. Shiny fits like that are common in null sec, low sec and high sec. The main difference is that in null sec, low sec and high sec those ships very rarely actually die. Hence, no kill mails.
And no, I don't live in WH space. I live in low sec, and it's pretty damn safe.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1206
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 20:19:00 -
[50] - Quote
Good news guys, Darth is finally unsubbing this week.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1454100#post1454100
It seems adapting is too hard, he's going to leave because he can't make any ISK. Everyone be sure to add him to watch list and mock him if he's still online in 7 days.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1206
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 04:09:00 -
[51] - Quote
Substantia Nigra wrote:I canGÇÖt see why the fuss about GÇÿblue lootGÇÖ. They are simply the sleeper analogue of the other ratsGÇÖ bounties. Rather than CONCORD, or whoever, paying you a bounty when you kill a pirat you get the grab those blue things from the wrecks and later various NPCs in empire space will buy them from you for a fixed amount. Just like other rats you also get to salvage the wrecks and, unlike most other rats, you can get some pretty nice salvage items GǪ subject to the incessant GÇÿCCP nerfed melted dropsGÇÖ moans.
Making your isk from Sleeper-PvE is a whole different game to hisec missions or incursions, or even lowsec / nullsec plexes. Not only are you GÇÿrattingGÇÖ in a very hostile environment (no-sec and no-local) but you do not realise a single milli-isk in income until you also haul your takings to empire space and to a system where you can sell it on the market. My biggest single loss in eve was around 5 billion GǪ hauling a few weeks of sleeper takings thru hisec to market. IGÇÖd got it safely out of w-space, thru an adjoining C2, but stupidly ran the 4-jump hisec route in my hauler rather than 20+ jumping a fenrir / orca / prowler over to pick it up. It was an expensive lesson, and a major delay for the get-subs-a-jump-freighter program.
Obviously the nerf-everything brigade are gonna want to nerf w-space too GǪ but IMO being a bear in w-space is a whole different thing to PvE anywhere else in eve. You can certainly earn a lot of isk, but not without surmounting some pretty major risks GǪ even during the hisec phases of converting your PvE to isk.
Tbf there is no fuss about blue loot, its 20 something pages of people who think whs are fine. Versus Darth, and some random guy who's gone all bitter vet coz his corp got kicked out of whs.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1207
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 07:46:00 -
[52] - Quote
Qui Shon wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Tbf there is no fuss about blue loot, its 20 something pages of people who think whs are fine. Versus Darth, and some random guy who's gone all bitter vet coz his corp got kicked out of whs. Nah, I've gone "bitter vet" because the blobs are five times as big as when I last played and because everyone flies around with as much bling as I always did, or more even. Which means I can't do my thing alone anymore and will have to become a ***** like you, bound to his flock, if I want to attack peeps in high class wh's. Posting to confirm I both live in wormholes and am "bound to my flock". What can I say, I just love blobbing so much.
So basically your complaint is that you are more space poor than the people around you, and they won't let you make loads of money like them because they keep engaging you in ~surprise PvP~.
Welcome to Eve Online.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1207
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 18:02:00 -
[53] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Well if darth doesnt quit i am sure i can find a nice c6 for him and his incurions mates to move in and farm in to get the easy isk he is after. Oh god I would love to see a bunch of incursion runners in a wormhole.
Is it possible to get low sec statics in C6s? Because I'd hate to think that Darth is going to be running around in a WH and I'm never going to get the chance to pop in and kill the crap out him say hi.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1244
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 00:28:00 -
[54] - Quote
joes Bazooka wrote:Masikari wrote:People really need to stop feeding this thread. OP is an idiot. Please stop giving the idiot attention. He doesn't want to and cannot understand the mechanics of WH's. Leave him to rot with his dusty Incursion ship.
It pains me to type this as it is bumping it to the top. But please, no more. Our WH forum is polluted enough by newbies crying for free help, but this thread has really dirtied the water.
Please, stop feeding the idiotic troll! The problem is not feeding the troll though, there are many threads that have whined about WH's recently but none of them have been moved to the WH subsection and without an ISD or CCP employee game enough to put their name on moving it here. So you can be assured someone that wanted to get responses about the topic and moved it here for a reason so it is no longer about explaining WH mechanics to the OP. I suspect they moved it here because it was cluttering up GD, and OP was bumping it every few days.
Unfortunately on this sub-forum you guys don't get enough new threads to bury this thing.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1246
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 04:10:00 -
[55] - Quote
joes Bazooka wrote:See i tend to dissagree, i do think we should be responding if there is a possibility someone of relevence may read it.
For instance i feel some WH classes should be buffed rather than nerfed, for instance C2's and C4's do not represent a good level of ISK/hour compared to other lower class respective WH's. I would tend to agree, if it wasn't for the 20+ pages of people disagreeing with Darth with only one other poster who has agreed with him.
Literally, in 20+ pages one person has supported the idea. I don't think CCP are going to act on it any time soon.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1273
|
Posted - 2012.06.19 12:55:00 -
[56] - Quote
Masikari wrote:joes Bazooka wrote:See i tend to dissagree, i do think we should be responding if there is a possibility someone of relevence may read it.
For instance i feel some WH classes should be buffed rather than nerfed, for instance C2's and C4's do not represent a good level of ISK/hour compared to other lower class respective WH's. Yeah, I would 't mind C4's sites spawning a little faster than they currently do. But then they only have one static to worry about, so I don't know if that's intended for the balance. It's funny isn't it Simi - all the posts going against Darth's proposal. Nearly all of the responses actually explain why, too, and not just telling him to STFU. I still can't work out if he's just (very successfully) trolling or is really that upset that his Incursions have gone. But have you read the latest 1.1 update, Darth? They're reversing the 10% blunting cut. You have you ISK back. Surely you must be over the moon!! Are you happy now? You can't complain any more, surely? No no, he's still complaining in other threads.
In fact I haven't seen him post in a while, with any luck he's finally quit. He was threatening to for like 2 months so it would make sense.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub Like I Give A F--K
1424
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 12:56:00 -
[57] - Quote
Bumping an extremely interesting thread full of productive discussion and brilliant insight on behalf of the OP.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |
| |
|